Why does Rachels think that the moral equivalence of killing and letting die is demonstrated by consideration of a single case: the fact that Smith…

[ad_1]

Why does Rachels contemplate that the probable equivalence of killing and letting die is demonstrated by subsidy of a separate case: the occurrence that Smith and Jones are similar bad. (In other suffrage, why does Rachels contemplate the avoid forestate of the Smith-Jones Argument is penny?)

Show further

[ad_2]
Source incorporate