1) what is religion not?2) Select one of the following proofs for the existence of God:
2) Select one of the forthcoming evidences for the being of God:
the ontological, cosmological, or teleological evidence. Interpret how the evidence attempts to interpret God's being and realize the associated after a while your chosen evidence. What are the merits of the evidence? What does the evidence conduct seriously encircling God's being?
3) Now, realize at smallest two counterarguments opposing the evidence you chosen in the earlier scrutiny. Who is the doctor associated after a while each counterargument? What do they say is flawed encircling the ontological or cosmological or teleological evidence? What are the merits of their counterargument?