Answer the following questions BASED on ATTACHED files
The homeachievement questions to-boot stable in the signal perfect(HW.docx) denominated HW.
Answer the aftercited questions BASED on ATTACHED perfects
1-You are revisaling proposals submitted for the “Lambert Park Phase 2” scheme. Using the RFP evaluate 2 of the 4 proposals and jaw them on the evaluation fencing granted (severed excel perfect, disown consume for this assignment).
Criteria max jaw commets jaw commets
points Co#1 Co#1 Co#2 Co#2
Expertise, Habit & Training 25
Plus Preceding Contracting History(25%)
The expertise, habit and
training of the proposer and its key
personnel and preceding habit
after a occasion resembling achievement in resembling fields and
qualifications and profundity of the staff
that succeed performthe achievement on this
project. This element includes evaluation
of the proposer’s preceding contracting history
, including the revisal of the proposer’s
certifications of to sham claims,
debarment and polite litigation.
Project Approach (40%) – The 40
proposer’s responsiveness in developing
a all pur-pose suitableness meeting
regulatory requirements and
the City’s restricted needs
Schedule (10%) – Proposal for 10
completing the scheme in a opportune
manner, comprehensive of the proposer’s
power to fulfill dubious paths for
the opportune and suitable completion
of all achievement incomplete subordinateneathneath the RFP.
Compliance after a occasion RFP (10%) – The power of 10
the proposer to resign after a occasion all instructions
set forth subordinateneathneath this RFP as well-mannered-mannered as the proposer’s
power to comport to all of the stipulations and conditions
of the stable PSA after a occasionout alteration,
particularly as relates to restitution,
insurance requirements and standards of economy.
Cost (15%) – The designed restitution 15
structure (comprehensive of hourly rates of
compensation, by through consumes and
subconsultant consumes) for the enterprise of
Tasks 1 through 8, comprehensive of its designed not-to
-exceed sum. The proposers designed policy for
containing consumes incurred by City suitableness quiet meeting
the objectives and standards set forth underneath the RFP.
2. Lavish Management Case Study - ANMC
Part A: Evaluate the lavishs associated after a occasion completing this scheme by using a lavish matrix. Fulfill at smallest 6 significant threats, settle your probpower and consume scales, evaluate the lavishs and catalogue the threats in appoint from chief to meanest lavish.
Part B: Of the lavishs you identified, which lavishs should you lenify? What steps could you conduct to manipulate and/or lenify the lavishs you identified
Risk Analysis & Lavish Management: Evaluating and Managing the Risks You Face, http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMC_07.htm